Arwed Messmer: Reenactment MfS

Arwed Messmer: Reenactment MfS

hardcover, with 32 page booklet hardcover German, English 256 pages 180mm x 250mm

Introduction

In the archives of East Germany’s Ministry for State Security — the Stasi — lie countless photographs of failed attempts to cross the Berlin Wall. Arwed Messmer’s Reenactment MfS takes a selection of these pictures as its starting point and places them alongside further images of official evidence held by the archives of the Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Records. The subject is not escape as anecdote but the photographic apparatus that recorded it: who photographed, for what file, and with what assumptions about proof.

What emerges is less a documentary album than a collage. Found images, retouched and recontextualized, are brought together with photographs Messmer made himself, so that anonymous institutional records and authored work sit in the same visual field. The photo critic Gerry Badger characterized this working method as “an artistic reevaluation of history.” The joining is the argument: the pictures are handled as material to be weighed and rearranged, not as transparent windows onto an event.

Florian Ebner’s phrase for Messmer’s stance, “documentary empathy,” points to the same tension. The book presses on the authenticity of the documentary image, which, in the publisher’s account, is never entirely free of “enactment.” Published in 2014, twenty-five years after the Wall fell, it returns to a central theme of recent German history with an approach that asks how photography itself has been used to frame that history.

The volume is published by Hatje Cantz: 256 pages, 148 photographs, hardcover with a 32-page booklet, 180 by 250 millimeters, in German and English, designed by Carsten Eisfeld. For a collection built around archival appropriation and the questioning of photographic evidence, this is a focused, deliberate example — a photographer working directly on state records, with the collision of official image and authorial intervention left visible rather than smoothed away.

COMMUNITY DISCUSSION

Discuss this entry

Share interpretations, reading notes, and source-aware questions. For catalog corrections, use the feedback form below.

My discussions

No discussion yet. Start the first focused conversation.

Sign in to join the discussion.