Martin Roemers: The Eyes of War

Martin Roemers: The Eyes of War

hardcover German, English, Dutch 128 pages 246mm x 286mm

Introduction

Martin Roemers’s The Eyes of War grew from a portrait of a person blinded during the Second World War, a face in which Roemers found something larger than one biography. From there he went looking for others: people who had lost their sight as children in wartime or as young soldiers, and who carried that injury into their later lives. The Eyes of War presents around forty of them, drawn from a much larger group he sought out across Europe.

The publication combines around forty portraits with accompanying interviews, so the book is as much spoken record as it is a body of photographs. The sitters talk; Roemers photographs. Cees Nooteboom contributes a foreword and the photographer adds texts of his own. The volume is published in German, English and Dutch, an arrangement that suits a subject crossing borders by definition: those portrayed come from Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Ukraine and Russia, places divided by wartime allegiances. The book brings together survivors injured as children or young soldiers through the shared aftermath of blindness.

That levelling is where the book’s weight lies. Its title is a metaphor the photographs keep literal — sight gone, the war still legible in a face. The portraits decline to rank victor above defeated; what remains is a shared physical circumstance and a set of separate memories, each with its own accent and detail. The traces of the war may seem to have faded from view; these faces are among the places they have not.

Hatje Cantz issued the book in 2012: 128 pages, hardcover, 246 × 286 mm, edited by Nadine Barth and Maartje Wildeman, designed by Julia Wagner of grafikanstalt with Hans van Blommestein. It appeared alongside an exhibition at the Kunsthal Rotterdam, 3 May–26 August 2012. What earns it a collector’s attention is the pairing of portrait and interview, through which survivors of the war are treated as particular people rather than as illustrations of history.

COMMUNITY DISCUSSION

Discuss this entry

Share interpretations, reading notes, and source-aware questions. For catalog corrections, use the feedback form below.

My discussions

No discussion yet. Start the first focused conversation.

Sign in to join the discussion.